Skip to main content

The Role of Reverend Ambrose

In “A Lesson Before Dying”, there’s a sense that every character has his or her own role to play within the story. For example, Grant’s role is to be a teacher to his own students and Jefferson, Tante Lou’s role is to take care of Miss Emma including Grant, and Jefferson’s role is to learn that he is a man. However, one character that has an unclear role is Reverend Ambrose. He does have the same role as Grant, but he’s ineffective within his role. He is unable to make a connection or have any influence on Jefferson. All the while he criticizes Grant for basically doing what is asked of him.
As if Reverend Ambrose is annoyed at Grant, he keeps pushing him to do things that Grant doesn’t want to. Take chapter 27 for example, he tells Grant to teach Jefferson the words of God as he says, “This is a mean world. But there is a better one. I wish to prepare him for that better world. But I need your help”, knowing that Grant is not a religious person (Gaines 214).  Personally, I don’t think that it’s wrong to teach Jefferson the words of God, but I disagree with the way Reverend Ambrose is going about it. He spends a good amount of time criticizing Grant and how Grant is “not educated”, even though Grant is doing his best to help Jefferson. 
Another incident involving Reverend Ambrose is his hatred against listening to a radio in chapter 23. I understand that Jefferson might have too far with choosing to listen to the radio rather than meeting his godmother. However, that doesn’t justify Reverend Ambrose's criticism of Grant, saying, “’ Listen to the teacher of our children” and “We got to have it your way or else, that’s it?” (Gaines 182-183). My frustration is that Grant is doing his best to connect with Jefferson and here’s someone that is so critical on Grant even though it is also his role to teach Jefferson. If Reverend Ambrose doesn’t like Grant’s teachings, then why can’t he teach Jefferson himself. He would just need to find own way to connect with Jefferson. Quite honestly, I think Reverend Ambrose's only role is to criticize Grant. 




Comments

  1. Ambrose seems like someone who wants to be helpful to Emma's cause, but whose views directly oppose those of Grant's. As a result, he becomes almost a villain or enemy, rejecting Grant's views and trying to work against him, even for a common cause.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ambrose's role is quite confusing in this story. He's certainly on Mrs. Emma's side and has to goal of helping Jefferson. I thought of Ambrose and Grant as teachers, but of different subjects: Grant is supposed to teach Jefferson to be a man, and Ambrose is supposed to teach Jefferson about religion and the afterlife. Although Ambrose and Grant often have many conflicts, I wouldn't say that Ambrose is a villain or enemy. I saw him as more of an ineffective ally (as he had the same goal as Grant).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Relationship Between Denver and Sethe

    Throughout the reading of Beloved , I have noticed a trend in the relationship between Sethe and Denver. Denver always seems slightly tentative towards Sethe and we know why. She is scared that her mother might kill her just like she did with Beloved. For instance, on page 206 (according to my version of the book), Denver states, “When she finishes the combing and starts the braiding, I get sleepy. I want to go to sleep but I know If I do I won’t wake up“.   It is disturbing to see the distrust Denver has for her mom, despite no ill intent from Sethe. The animosity between them, however, hasn’t always existed.      There is a point in time where Denver is clueless of Sethe’s past. It’s probable that their relationship might have actually been a normal mother and daughter relationship. The truth comes out after Denver’s incident with the bullies at her school. The effect of the truth impacts Denver so much to the point where she is un...

The Revenge of the Odyssey

From our class discussion last week, a topic came up that I thought was very interesting. It was that the Odyssey has a series of revenge cycles. Throughout the book, almost every character has wanted to take revenge on someone. The most notable of these is Odysseus’ mass murder of the suitors. They ransacked his house and tried to court his wife, so it makes sense that he would be looking to get back at them. Another example of revenge in the Odyssey is when Odysseus decides to blind Polyphemus after he killed Odysseus’ crew members. This incident set off Poseidon’s rage and he trapped Odysseus on Calypso's island for 7 years. The cycles of revenge continue to the very end of the book when the suitors’ fathers want to murder Odysseus. I think that all of these revenge cycles were set off by one incident: Odysseus blinding Polyphemus. If he had kept his cool and not blinded Polyphemus, then everything would have been fine. He had another chance to save himself and crew, simply...

Athena's True Intentions

What is Athena’s true intention? We all know that Athena adores Odysseus and Telemachus. She blesses Odysseus during the invasion of Troy and guides Telemachus on his journey. As phrased by Mr. Mitchell, Athena “digs Odysseus.” However, it is not clear why she is helping them after abandoning Odysseus on Calypso’s island for seven years and allowing the suitors to torment Telemachus for most of his life.             One theory I have is that Athena feels remorse for abandoning Odysseus; after all, she is responsible for him. As consolation for Odysseus, Athena decides to free him and helps mold his son into a hero. If Odysseus had made it home in time, he would have been the one teaching Telemachus the ways of a hero, so perhaps Athena wants to develop Telemachus to make up for lost time due to Odysseus’ absence. There also seems to be an urgency for Telemachus’ development which has to do with his father’s arrival to Ithaca...